Is it ethical to offer and charge for low intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction?

Posted by Bruce Gilbert on

The ethical considerations surrounding the use of low intensity shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) involve balancing the potential benefits and risks of the treatment with the ethical principles of patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. An interesting opinion was recently published in AUANews by an expert Urologist in our field. Read more....

LI-ESWT is a non-invasive treatment that uses low-energy shockwaves to stimulate the growth of new blood vessels and improve blood flow to the penis, which can improve erectile function in some men with ED. While some studies have shown promising results, the evidence for the effectiveness of LI-ESWT for ED is still limited, and the treatment is not yet FDA-approved for this use.

In terms of patient autonomy, it is important to ensure that patients have access to accurate and unbiased information about the potential benefits and risks of LI-ESWT for ED, and that they are able to make informed decisions about whether to pursue this treatment. Patients should also be informed of other treatment options that may be more effective or appropriate for their specific needs.

The principles of beneficence and non-maleficence require healthcare providers to act in the best interests of their patients and to do no harm. While LI-ESWT is generally considered safe and well-tolerated, there are some potential risks and side effects, including bruising, pain, and numbness. Physicians should carefully evaluate each patient's medical history and individual risk factors to determine whether LI-ESWT is an appropriate treatment option, and they should monitor patients closely for any adverse effects.

Finally, the principle of justice requires that healthcare resources be allocated fairly and equitably. Providers should ensure that LI-ESWT is offered in a way that does not discriminate against patients based on their race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status.

In conclusion, the ethical considerations surrounding the use of LI-ESWT for ED involve careful consideration of the potential benefits and risks of the treatment, as well as the principles of patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. If LI-ESWT is offered and charged for, it should be done in a way that prioritizes patient safety, informed consent, and equitable access to care.

For additional information please call 516-487-2700 to set-up a courtesy consultation with Dr. Gilbert to discuss options for you.